Eyck/Bliss/Dustin
Attendees: Dustin J Ross, Bliss Perry, Eyck Date: March 9, 2026 Type: Partner Session
Summary
China Travel & Security Clearance Discussion
- Anonymous considering month in China working for Hong Kong-based PE firm
- Speaks Chinese, has 10 years China experience
- Concerned about impact on future security clearance
- Advisor’s guidance on clearance process
- Not necessarily disqualifying but requires careful documentation
- Key risk factors: financial leverage, personal relationships, ego/fame motivations
- Critical: never lie on SF86 form (perjury risk)
- Avoid taking money from PRC entities or using WeChat for business
- Current environment increasingly risky
- MSS recruitment becoming more brazen on campuses
- Advisor’s personal experience: detained at Beijing airport despite precautions
- Recommendation: consult clearance experts before travel
Digital Twin Concept Validation
- Proposed product: Digital twin of semiconductor supply chain
- Map complete topology of firms, transactions, capacities, ownership
- Enable simulations and predictive analytics on supply chain disruptions
- Advisor feedback on data acquisition challenges
- Most critical data is proprietary (Applied Materials tier-3 suppliers unknown)
- Packaging/testing companies largely private Malaysian firms
- Need value exchange model: “you give us your data, we give you ours”
- Competitive landscape
- Wirescreen (Dave Barboza) - Chinese corporate records/due diligence
- Exeger - employs ex-House Select Committee staff
- Multiple companies doing open source intelligence on Chinese entities
Market Opportunity Assessment
- Compliance as initial wedge strategy
- Applied Materials paid $250M fine, Cadence nine-digit penalties
- Automated export control/restricted entity verification as entry point
- Cold start problem: need initial value proposition to acquire proprietary data
- Alternative focus areas with simpler supply chains
- Drone supply chain (Skydio battery cutoff case study)
- Critical minerals dependencies
- Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs)
- Defense applications more tractable than full semiconductor mapping
Strategic Recommendations
- Defense tech as optimal initial market
- Anduril better target than Lockheed (simpler, modular systems)
- Clean supply chain as competitive differentiator for contracts
- Smaller component count makes mapping feasible
- Business model considerations
- Selling to established defense primes (Palantir, Anduril) vs crossing valley of death
- Revenue growth story (offensive capability) vs cost reduction (defensive)
- Government regulatory play requires betting on timing of rule changes
- Next steps: Continue conversation post-spring break, potential GSB speaking engagement
Co-founder Signal Debrief
Sourced from Signal chat, 2026-03-09
Post-meeting reactions:
Bliss: “Yeah he’s very insightful. Seems like a very interdisciplinary thinker across academics, policy, and some business as well.”
Dustin’s strategic synthesis from this meeting — a key reframe of their core weakness: “We designed a business model without any unique customer insight. That’s always been our weakness. This strategy allows our weakness to become a strength… We’re gonna build this digital twin by undercutting the market on compliance and then monetizing otherwise.”
New customer discovery discipline adopted after this meeting: “In these conversations we should now be relentlessly pushing towards ‘who might be interested in this problem’ like we did today” — which surfaced a new lead on transshipment/demand from new defense primes.
Shyam Sankar framing (shared by Bliss the same week): “Our view is that all the economic value accrues to chips and ontology… If you decompose a complex process like insurance underwriting into discrete steps, the models become much more reliable. It’s a way of getting the stochastic genie into a straitjacket.” — founders saw this as validating their ontology-first approach.
Follow-up: Eyck meeting proposed for second week after spring break; dinner with Eyck and Emily (TA) also discussed.